[bdNOG] Cisco VPN Router
Md Ashifuzzaman
mashifuzzaman at banglalinkgsm.com
Sat Nov 16 09:11:22 BDT 2013
Can anyone would remove me from the mailing list as I am not relevant with this topics.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Md Ashifuzzaman
Information Technology
Banglalink
Mobile: +88 019 26662 488
-----Original Message-----
From: nog-bounces at bdnog.org [mailto:nog-bounces at bdnog.org] On Behalf Of Nurul Islam
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:21 AM
To: Aniruddha Barua
Cc: bdNOGNOG list
Subject: Re: [bdNOG] Cisco VPN Router
Upssssss. You are right Barua "not threats" but threads. Apology. I should disable autocorrect in my mail client. :)
-Roman
On 16/11/13 4:20 AM, "Aniruddha Barua" <aniruddha.barua at colbd.com> wrote:
>Roman bhai,
>
>Threads. It would be threads. Not threats.;-)
>
>Regards,
>
>ANIRUDDHA BARUA
>Email: aniruddha.barua at colbd.com, cto at colbd.com
>Cell: +880.1713.111222
>Web: http://www.colbd.com
>
>
>On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Nurul Islam <nurul at apnic.net> wrote:
>
>> I think Momen's question is about the overlay VPN model (5/10 years
>>ago) where CPE router create IPSec tunnel (customer data security
>>purpose) and SP POP router need to create another tunnel (GRE/IPSec)
>>to isolate their routing prefixes. Because several customer or SP
>>infrastructure might use the same private address range. I think this
>>overlay VPN model is replaced with MPLS L3 VPN where SP do not need
>>to create any GRE/IPSec tunnel to isolate their routing prefix. SP
>>now simply create VRF on the POP router and individual customer
>>prefixes are isolated by VPNv4 address family etc etc.
>>
>> By asking "VRF instead of GRE on PE" if you mean MPLS L3/L2 VPN, then
>>yes it is available in Dhaka. At least Pseudo-wire for sure. Is VPLS
>>also available in Bangladesh?
>>
>> What is the required CPE hardware that is also discussed on other reply.
>>
>> Thanks to bdNOG community. Keep posting more threats and let everyone
>> participate. We need active people to run our NOG.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>
>> On 16/11/13 2:14 AM, "Md. Khairul Alam" <khairulbd at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think the the technology using by the SP is not the main concern
>>>of the banks. Banks should have own policy to secure the data
>>>transmission between HO and branches. As a customer I must want the
>>>maximum availability of the link from the SP and choose the security
>>>technology in my routers.
>>>
>>> For small branches most are using 1900 series with K9 license I
>>>guess and
>>> 2900 series for larger bandwidth requirement.
>>>
>>> Thanks very much bdNOG for giving us the opportunity to share.
>>>
>>> BR//Khairul
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> On Fri, 15/11/13, Aniruddha Barua <aniruddha.barua at colbd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [bdNOG] Cisco VPN Router
>>> To: "NOG list, bdNOG" <nog at bdnog.org>
>>> Received: Friday, 15 November, 2013, 6:33 PM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Momen,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe you are asking the question considering the entire
>>> architecture, not just from the customer (Bank) or the provider (SP)
>>> point of view. If a bank wants to connect their branch routers in
>>> Layer 2 over SP network, the SP has to give them either GRE based
>>> tunnels (Mikrotik's EoIP or PPTP-Bridge etc., are common technics)
>>> or MPLS Layer 2 (EoMPLS, VPLS etc.). If a bank wants to connect the
>>> branch routers in Layer 3 over SP network, the SP can give them
>>> anything from simple routing (Static or Dynamic) to plain VRF (i.e.
>>> VRF Lite) to MPLS Layer 3 to even dedicated fiber (this is too much
>>> though!!).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To maintain information security and confidentiality, regardless of
>>> what the SP is providing in its infrastructure, the bank has to
>>> encrypt-decrypt (mostly with
>>> IPSec) its traffic in between its routers, which will pass through
>>> either the Layer 2 tunnels or the Layer 3 routed paths provided by
>>> the SP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My question to all is, should banks demand a specific technology
>>> like VRF or MPLS or any other from the SP as long as their
>>> requirements are met perfectly well by the SP using its current
>>> technologies?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> bdNOG mailing list is on the jazz today. Regards to all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ANIRUDDHA BARUA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Email: aniruddha.barua at colbd.com, cto at colbd.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cell: +880.1713.111222
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Web: http://www.colbd.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original Message
>>> -----------
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Abdul Momen <abdulmomen918 at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To: ariful.islam at totalofftec.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cc: nog-bounces at bdnog.org, "nog at bdnog.org"
>>> <nog at bdnog.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:22:33 +1000
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [bdNOG] Cisco VPN Router
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I believe it is mostly ipsec (CPE
>>> router) inside GRE(PE router)? Is it possible to get VRF instead of
>>> GRE on PE router.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks & regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Momen
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Arif @
>>> TOTALOFFTEC
>>> <ariful.islam at totalofftec.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have fortinet wifi router.
>>>
>>>
>>> -arif- +8801678005123
>>> . Apologies kept short sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone
>>> - Airtel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Nurul Islam <nurul at apnic.net>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sender: nog-bounces at bdnog.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 06:17:25
>>>
>>>
>>> To: fakrul at dhakacom.com<fakrul at dhakacom.com>;
>>> nog at bdnog.org<nog at bdnog.org>;
>>> Abdul Momen<abdulmomen918 at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [bdNOG] Cisco VPN Router
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Few more on the [UTF-8?]listÅ .MikroTik, Fortigate, What model? what
>>> else?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And obviously Cisco. (For the elite class I suppose. :).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Roman
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/11/13 3:42 PM, "Fakrul Alam" <fakrul at dhakacom.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dear Mr Momen,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ya, it's mainly 800 series with K9 bundle. I know
>>> few banks who use
>>> 1900
>>>
>>>
>>>> series in metropolitan branches where there is higher
>>> b/w & pps
>>>
>>>
>>>> requirements.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Fakrul Alam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 11/15/13, 6:29 AM, Abdul Momen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Dear bdnog people,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I have a quick question. What are the commonly used
>>> VPN router used
>>> in
>>>
>>>
>>>>> the
>>>
>>>
>>>>> bank brunches in Dhaka. I guess CISCO831-K9 still
>>> used in some
>>> places.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Correct? What are other cost effective
>>> alternatives.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Momen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>>> nog mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>>>> nog at bdnog.org
>>>
>>>
>>>>> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>> nog mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>>> nog at bdnog.org
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>> nog mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>> nog at bdnog.org
>>>
>>>
>>> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------- End of Original Message
>>> -------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nog mailing list
>>> nog at bdnog.org
>>> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nog mailing list
>>> nog at bdnog.org
>>> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nog mailing list
>> nog at bdnog.org
>> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
_______________________________________________
nog mailing list
nog at bdnog.org
http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
More information about the nog
mailing list