[bdNOG] BIG FAT Pipe with INDIA - or - GOOD Transit Providers - or - Something else
Mohibul Hasib Mahmud
mhasib at gmail.com
Sat Nov 23 12:10:35 BDT 2013
My personal observation is we should work for more local peering and global
cache locally in the form of CDN ( global CDN like Akamai) to improve end
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Nurul Islam Roman <nurul at apnic.net> wrote:
> What is something else :).
> Is it more peering? Does it worth peering with IPLC? Or should we
> advocate more local peering and bring global cache locally? I have got
> positive comments in BD though regarding peering with IPLC (specially end
> user experience) and also price perspective. What is the community thought
> on this? BIG FAT vs Good quality? Thanks Simon for bringing this. :)
> On 23/11/13 4:52 AM, "Fakrul Alam" <fakrul at bdhub.com> wrote:
> >This been tricky. There are two aspects; financial & technical.
> >Technically it's been great to have big names like PCCW, HGC, HKIX,
> >Telstra, NTT, AT&T; but you need to find out whether it's been feasible
> >financially when:
> >1. You have 30++ IIG in the market.
> >2. BSCCL half circuit price is roughly 80% of your total b/w cost for
> >3. 10% revenue share with BTRC.
> >4. Competitive market where price win in all aspect.
> >5. ITC holding IIG license (I know there will be lot of arguments)
> >On 11/22/13, 9:17 PM, Simon Sohel Baroi / IIG-ITC / Sr.Manager /
> >01678618243 / wrote:
> >> Dear All,
> >> I think so many topic is going on. I want to add another one. This is
> >> really important as all of us want to have a good internet in
> >> Before the ITC Connectivity comes to Bangladesh. We found MANGO and BTCL
> >> connected with different Tire-1 IP Transit Providers.
> >> But the number were limited to TIS, Bharti, Singtel, TM. As the price
> >> really high, then people couldn't tell anything about the transit
> >> I found MANGO sometimes added some new name in their list. But BTCL
> >> as expected. Now the new player, BSCCL is connected only with TIS.
> >> When ITC comes, the scenario become worst. The internet cost reduced 82%
> >> and all of us get connected with TATA and Bharti.
> >> As the big borthers wont allow the ITC provider to go with IPLC and go
> >> other providers. The price is binded with their IP Transit. Some kind of
> >> IPLC kinle IPTransit FREE.
> >> All of us Bharti and TATA - with big big pipe. When a client ping from
> >> laptop, they have to pass atleast one of them.
> >> *Don't you think, we are missing some good things ? ( Big names like
> >> HGC, HKIX, Telstra, NTT, AT&T etc ) *
> >> *Don't you think, we are giving client a very bad internet experience ?*
> >> *OR*
> >> *Getting Google within 70ms is more than enough for the client.*
> >> What do you think - BIG FAT Pipe with INDIA - or - GOOD Transit
> >> - or - Something else. ?
> >> - with regards
> >> SIMON
> >> *( Apu da and Amin vai, please don't get me wrong as I have used MANGO's
> >> name without your permission )*
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nog mailing list
> >> nog at bdnog.org
> >> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
> >nog mailing list
> >nog at bdnog.org
> nog mailing list
> nog at bdnog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the nog