[bdNOG] BIG FAT Pipe with INDIA - or - GOOD Transit Providers - or - Something else

Sat Nov 23 12:26:45 BDT 2013

That's good idea mohibul bhai.  Already couple of transit provider do this
as like GGC . so far my information at present in BD we have no akamai
cache, is it  ?

if not then we can take initiative together for this and host this our
local IX by discussion  . i think this  would be good idea by consider
present scenario .

Regards  //  Jahangir

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Mohibul Hasib Mahmud <mhasib at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> My personal observation is we should work for more local peering and
> global cache locally in the form of CDN ( global CDN like Akamai) to
> improve end user experience.
>
> Thanks
> Hasib
> BRACNet
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Nurul Islam Roman <nurul at apnic.net>wrote:
>
>> What is something else :).
>>
>> Is it more peering? Does it worth peering with IPLC?  Or should we
>> advocate more local peering and bring global cache locally?  I have got
>> positive comments in BD though regarding peering with IPLC (specially end
>> user experience) and also price perspective. What is the community thought
>> on this? BIG FAT vs Good quality? Thanks Simon for bringing this. :)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 23/11/13 4:52 AM, "Fakrul Alam" <fakrul at bdhub.com> wrote:
>>
>> >This been tricky. There are two aspects; financial & technical.
>> >Technically it's been great to have big names like PCCW, HGC, HKIX,
>> >Telstra, NTT, AT&T; but you need to find out whether it's been feasible
>> >financially when:
>> >
>> >1. You have 30++ IIG in the market.
>> >2. BSCCL half circuit price is roughly 80% of your total b/w cost for
>> >SMW4.
>> >3. 10% revenue share with BTRC.
>> >4. Competitive market where price win in all aspect.
>> >5. ITC holding IIG license (I know there will be lot of arguments)
>> >
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >
>> >-Pappu
>> >
>> >
>> >On 11/22/13, 9:17 PM, Simon Sohel Baroi / IIG-ITC / Sr.Manager /
>> >01678618243 / wrote:
>> >> Dear All,
>> >>
>> >> I think so many topic is going on. I want to add another one. This is
>> >> really important as all of us want to have a good internet in
>> >>Bangladesh.
>> >>
>> >> Before the ITC Connectivity comes to Bangladesh. We found MANGO and
>> BTCL
>> >> connected with different Tire-1 IP Transit Providers.
>> >> But the number were limited to TIS, Bharti, Singtel, TM. As the price
>> >>was
>> >> really high, then people couldn't tell anything about the transit
>> >>provider.
>> >> I found MANGO sometimes added some new name in their list. But BTCL
>> >>didn't,
>> >> as expected. Now the new player, BSCCL is connected only with TIS.
>> >>
>> >> When ITC comes, the scenario become worst. The internet cost reduced
>> 82%
>> >> and all of us get connected with TATA and Bharti.
>> >> As the big borthers wont allow the ITC provider to go with IPLC and go
>> >>to
>> >> other providers. The price is binded with their IP Transit. Some kind
>> of
>> >> IPLC kinle IPTransit FREE.
>> >>
>> >> All of us Bharti and TATA - with big big pipe. When a client ping from
>> >>the
>> >> laptop, they have to pass atleast one of them.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> *Don't you think, we are missing some good things ? ( Big names like
>> >>PCCW,
>> >> HGC, HKIX, Telstra, NTT, AT&T etc ) *
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> *Don't you think, we are giving client a very bad internet experience
>> ?*
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> *OR*
>> >> *Getting Google within 70ms is more than enough for the client.*
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What do you think - BIG FAT Pipe with INDIA  - or -  GOOD Transit
>> >>Providers
>> >> - or - Something else. ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> - with regards
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> SIMON
>> >> *( Apu da and Amin vai, please don't get me wrong as I have used
>> MANGO's
>> >> name without your permission )*
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> nog mailing list
>> >> nog at bdnog.org
>> >> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>> >>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >nog mailing list
>> >nog at bdnog.org
>> >http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nog mailing list
>> nog at bdnog.org
>> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nog mailing list
> nog at bdnog.org
> http://mailman.bdnog.org/mailman/listinfo/nog
>
>

-- 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.bdnog.org/pipermail/nog/attachments/20131123/10707ec9/attachment.html>